Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Williams

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 26, 1988No. D005564PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] OPINION

Charged with bank robbery by force or fear (Pen. Code,1 § 211), Maurice Williams was found not guilty by reason of insanity and committed to Patton State Hospital under section 1026. In July 1985, Williams was placed on "hospital parole." (§ 1611 (since repealed).) Six months later he was placed on outpatient status under section 1026.2, retroactive to July 1985.

In March 1986, Williams applied for release from commitment on the ground his sanity had been…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. FeagleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Cramer v. TyarsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  3. People v. FroomCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  4. In Re IngramCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  5. People v. BlackwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. Superior Court (Ghilotti)California Supreme Court · 2002
  2. People v. SwordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  3. People v. ZapisekCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  4. People v. BoldenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  5. State v. DudleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API