People v. Froom
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DeCRISTOFORO, J. *
Defendant Robert J. Froom appeals from an order committing him for a minimum period of 90 days to the state hospital or other mental institution, after a jury first found him guilty of violation of Penal Code section 246 (discharging a firearm at an inhabited dwelling), and then not guilty by reason of insanity (Pen. Code, § 1026). Defendant contends that the instructions during the guilt phase of his trial, on diminished capacity, unconsciousness and insanity were erroneous and confusing to the jury; that the trial court utilized an incorrect standard in determining…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- People v. SedenoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- People v. HoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- People v. GorshenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- People v. CantrellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- In Re SpencerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- People v. RogersCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- People v. AtkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- People v. Jerry R.California Court of Appeal · 1994
- People v. RamirezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
- In Re ChavezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.