People v. Boero
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Alameda County, and from an order denying a new trial. William S. Wells, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHall, J.
Defendant was convicted of the crime of rape íor having had sexual intercourse with a girl under sixteen years of age, and appealed from the judgment and order denying his motion for a new trial.
It is first urged that the evidence was insufficient to justify the verdict. It is not claimed that the girl did not give evidence that fully supported the charge, but it is claimed apparently that the evidence was in itself unreasonable, because it appears that the act was committed in the presence and with the approval of the wife of the defendant.
But in addition to the evidence of the girl, the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Thayer v. ThayerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
- People v. . O'SullivanNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
- People v. CastroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- People v. HolmesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- State v. MarkinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. ConverseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
- People v. MurietaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934