Legal Opinion

Arthur v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 25, 2007No. 2-06-030-CRPublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ANNE GARDNER, Justice.

Appellant Hilary Arthur appeals her conviction for driving while intoxicated. After the trial court denied Appellant’s motions to suppress, she waived her right to a jury trial and entered a plea of guilty. The trial court found Appellant guilty, assessed her punishment at a fine of $550 and 90 days in the county jail, and suspended imposition of the sentence by placing her on community supervision for a period of twenty-four months. In two points, Appellant asserts that the trial court erred by failing to suppress physical and testimonial evidence obtained at the…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  5. Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Campbell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2010
  2. Donna Jean Dill A/K/A Donna Zill v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2011
  3. Texas Department of Public Safety v. GilfeatherCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2009
  4. State v. Rudd, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2008
  5. Hennessy v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2008

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API