Legal Opinion
Allied Artists Pictures Corp. v. Rhodes
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided July 10, 1980No. C-2-78-1031PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DUNCAN, District Judge.
“Blind bidding” is a term used in the motion picture industry to describe the licensing of a motion picture to a theater owner without the owner’s first viewing the picture. Blind bidding and other practices by which motion picture producers and distributors license their product to exhibitors have been controversial and subject to varying degrees of governmental scrutiny at least since the 1940’s, when the Supreme Court was asked to review a far-reaching judicial decree regulating them. United States v. Paramount, 334 U.S. 131, 157, 68 S.Ct. 915, 929, 92 L.Ed.…
2Cases cited95 opinions
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Rode v. DellarcipreteCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Seven Gables Corp. v. MGM/UA Entertainment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
- Baltimore Orioles, Inc. v. Major League Baseball Players Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Taquino v. Teledyne Monarch RubberCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- Allied Artists Picture Corp., and Avco Embassy Pictures Corp., Cross-Appellees v. James A. Rhodes, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.