Legal Opinion

Glissmann v. Bauermeister

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 1942No. 31387PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPaine, J.

This cause came on to be heard before this court by the argument of á motion of Serena E. Grabow and John J. Grabow, defendants, to dismiss the appeal of Harold W. Glissmann, plaintiff, upon the ground that a transcript of proceedings had in the district court, and from which this appeal was taken, was not filed in this court within the period of three months from the entry of the order by the district judge.

This is the first case coming before this court involving the new statute on the question at issue. Under the law as set out in section 20-1912, Comp. St. 1929, a transcript must be filed…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Glissmann v. McDonaldNebraska Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Glissmann v. OrchardNebraska Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Glissmann v. BauermeisterNebraska Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Glissmann v. Happy Hollow ClubNebraska Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Power v. Federal Land BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Barney v. Platte Valley Public Power & Irrigation DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Moritz v. Nebraska State Railway CommissionNebraska Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Glissmann v. GrabowNebraska Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Barney v. Platte Valley Public Power & Irrigation DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Robinson v. MeyerNebraska Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API