Thacker v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
MILLER, Judge.
Defendant-appellant Robert Thacker appeals from a trial court’s administrative finding under our Implied Consent Law that he knowingly refused to take a breathalyzer test, such refusal resulting in the suspension of his driver’s license for one year. The sole question presented for our review is whether, despite a driver’s verbal consent, his belligerent behavior constitutes a refusal to take the test. We affirm.
FACTS
The facts are generally undisputed and viewed in the light most favorable to the State are as follows:
On the morning of February 12, 1982, Officer Quilla observed…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. PandoliNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970
- Swenumson v. Iowa Department of Public SafetySupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
- Davis v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
- Jaremczuk v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1978
- Steward v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. SchuberthAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
- Kristy Burnell v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2016
- Steward v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
- Kristy Burnell v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015
- Kristy Burnell v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015