Legal Opinion

Thacker v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 10, 1982No. 4-682A147PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLER, Judge.

Defendant-appellant Robert Thacker appeals from a trial court’s administrative finding under our Implied Consent Law that he knowingly refused to take a breathalyzer test, such refusal resulting in the suspension of his driver’s license for one year. The sole question presented for our review is whether, despite a driver’s verbal consent, his belligerent behavior constitutes a refusal to take the test. We affirm.

FACTS

The facts are generally undisputed and viewed in the light most favorable to the State are as follows:

On the morning of February 12, 1982, Officer Quilla observed…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. PandoliNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970
  2. Swenumson v. Iowa Department of Public SafetySupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
  3. Davis v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. Jaremczuk v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. Steward v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. SchuberthAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  2. Kristy Burnell v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Steward v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. Kristy Burnell v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. Kristy Burnell v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API