Jaremczuk v. State

Appellant-defendant Jaremczuk appeals the finding of the court below at an Implied Consent hearing 1 that the arresting officer had probable cause to stop the appellant-defendant and that the appellant-defendant knowingly refused a chemical test. We affirm.

The scope of our review is limited to determining whether the evidence is sufficient as a matter of law to support the finding that the arresting officer had probable cause to stop the appellant-defendant and the finding that appellant-defendant knowingly refused to submit to a chemical test. See Bowlin, supra, n.1. We will not weigh the…