Kristy Burnell v. State of Indiana
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
PYLE, Judge.
[1] Kristy Burnell (“Burnell”) appeals the trial court’s determination that she refused a certified chemical test during a traffic stop, which resulted in the suspension of her driving privileges pursuant to Indiana’s Implied Consent Law. On appeal, she argues that she consented to take the test and that her conduct was not tantamount to a, refusal. We affirm the trial court’s order, holding, as' a .matter of first impression, that any answer short of an unqualified, unequivocal assent to a properly offered certified chemical test constitutes a refusal.
[2] Affirmed.
Issue
Whether…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bolin v. WingertIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. PandoliNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970
- N.D.F. v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. EvansIndiana Supreme Court · 2004
- Davis v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kristy Burnell v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2016
- Kyle Hutton v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2016