Legal Opinion

Christian v. Soderberg

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1900PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Muskegon; Russell, J. Bill by Antoine Christian against Sam A. Soderberg and Anna Soderberg to foreclose a mortgage. Complainant appeals from an order denying, as to defendant Anna, an execution for a deficiency.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, C. J.

Defendants are husband and wife. On the 19th day of April, 1890, they made and executed a promissory note in the sum of $1,000, payable to complainant, and executed a mortgage collateral thereto. A bill was duly filed to foreclose this-mortgage, a subpoena served, together with a memorandum stating that a personal decree was sought against both defendants. Default was made by defendants, and a decree declaring both defendants liable for, and determining, the amount due, was duly entered. A sale of the mortgaged premises was had, and a deficiency reported. Application was thereupon made for an…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Jehle v. BrooksMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Wilson v. CoolidgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Haldane v. SweetMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Evans v. CalmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Simons v. McDonnellMichigan Supreme Court · 1899

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bank of Commerce of Toledo v. CorlissMichigan Supreme Court · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API