Legal Opinion

Jehle v. Brooks

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 17, 1897PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Kent; Grove, J. Bill by Fritz C. Jehle against Harry A. Brooks, impleaded with Henry Principaal and Mary Brooks, to foreclose a mortgage. Defendant Harry A. Brooks appeals from an order awarding an execution for a deficiency.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

This is an appeal from a decree rendered in a proceeding for a personal decree and the issuing of an execution for a deficiency in a foreclosure case. The original foreclosure proceeding was commenced by the complainant against all the defendants in this proceeding. The mortgage which was foreclosed was made by Henry Principaal. His grantee sold to Harry A. Brooks. The defendant Mary Brooks is the wife of Harry A. Brooks. Harry A. Brooks was brought in as a subsequent purchaser. His interest was stated in the bill of complaint as required by Chancery Rule 91. The subpcena contained an…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Van VelsorMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Schley v. . FryerNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  3. Payne v. AveryMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
  4. Winans v. WilkieMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  5. Corning v. BurtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1894

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. McDonald v. FinsethNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Kollen v. SooyMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Union Trust Co. v. Detroit Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1898
  4. South Amboy Trust Co. v. McMichael Holdings, Inc.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1947
  5. Union Trust Co. v. BrendlingerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1930

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API