Legal Opinion

State v. Franklin

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 27, 2014No. A13-1129PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PETERSON, Judge.

In this sentencing appeal, appellant argues that he should not have been sentenced as a career offender because (1) one of his prior felony convictions is deemed to be a conviction for a misdemeanor and, therefore, he does not have “five or more prior felony convictions” and (2) his current offense was not committed as part of a pattern of criminal conduct. We reverse and remand.

FACTS

In February 2013, appellant Michael Franklin pleaded guilty to a charge of fourth-degree controlled-substance offense. At the plea hearing, the prosecutor indicated that he would ask the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. RickSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
  2. State v. LindseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
  3. State v. MauerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  4. State v. WittSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  5. State v. PeckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State of Minnesota v. Michael David FranklinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
  2. State of Minnesota v. Evan James FasthorseCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API