State v. Franklin
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PETERSON, Judge.
In this sentencing appeal, appellant argues that he should not have been sentenced as a career offender because (1) one of his prior felony convictions is deemed to be a conviction for a misdemeanor and, therefore, he does not have “five or more prior felony convictions” and (2) his current offense was not committed as part of a pattern of criminal conduct. We reverse and remand.
FACTS
In February 2013, appellant Michael Franklin pleaded guilty to a charge of fourth-degree controlled-substance offense. At the plea hearing, the prosecutor indicated that he would ask the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. RickSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
- State v. LindseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
- State v. MauerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- State v. WittSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- State v. PeckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State of Minnesota v. Michael David FranklinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- State of Minnesota v. Evan James FasthorseCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024