Legal Opinion

State v. . Lovelace

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 19, 1947PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.

As bearing on the importance of the case under review, counsel for the State call our attention to certain historical, scientific and statistical facts concerning Brucellosis and its prevention in North Carolina, some of which may be within the judicial knowledge, while others may be informative; but they illustrate the necessity of adequate regulations for the protection of animal husbandry in the prevention of this disease, and, indeed, the health of the inhabitants of the State in the consumption, as food, of animal products affected by the Brucellosis germ. Some of the suggestions are…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Morgan's Steamship Co. v. Louisiana Board of HealthSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Asbell v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Mintz v. BaldwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  4. Oregon-Washington Railroad & Navigation Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  5. McSween v. State Live Stock Sanitary BoardSupreme Court of Florida · 1929

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. SchriberOregon Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Domestic Electric Service, Inc. v. City of Rocky MountCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
  3. Draughon v. MaddoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  4. Hughey v. CloningerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  5. Hughey v. CloningerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API