Legal Opinion
Mintz v. Baldwin
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided May 8, 1933No. 760PublishedCited by 81 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Butler
Plaintiffs have a large and valuable business in the raising, and in the sale and transportation from Wisconsin to New York, of cattle for dairy and breeding purposes. ' Defendant, acting under state statutes, made and is enforcing an order 1 to guard against Bang’s disease, bovine infectious abortion. The order requires that the. cattle imported' into Nevf York for. such purposes and also the herds from which, they come shall be certified to be. free from that disease by the chief 'sanitary official of the State of origin and that each shipment be accompanied by such a certificate.
Plaintiffs…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Savage v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Railroad Co. v. HusenSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Henderson v. Mayor of the City of New York Commissioners of Immigration v. North German LloydSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Reid v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by81 opinions
- Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Baldwin v. G. A. F. Seelig, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- New York State Department of Social Services v. DublinoSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- South Carolina State Highway Department v. Barnwell Bros.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.