Legal Opinion

Hasty v. Carpenter

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 6, 1979No. 7811SC54PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEBB, Judge.

The plaintiff chose to commence this action by having the summons issued with an order allowing her twenty days to file the complaint. This is a permitted method under G.S. 1A-1, Rule 3 which provides:

A civil action is commenced by filing a complaint with the court. The clerk shall enter the date of filing on the original complaint, and such entry shall be prima facie evidence of the date of filing.

A civil action may also be commenced by the issuance of a summons when(1) A person makes application to the court stating the nature and purpose of his action and requesting permission…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lewis Clarke Associates v. ToblerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
  2. Braswell v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Childress v. Forsyth County Hospital Authority, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  2. Hasty v. CarpenterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  3. Lusk v. Crawford Paint Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
  4. Dorothy R. Cannon v. The Kroger Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1988
  5. Dorothy R. Cannon v. The Kroger Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API