Legal Opinion · Dissent

Dorothy R. Cannon v. The Kroger Co.

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided January 29, 1988No. 86-1720Published

1DissentMurnaghan, Circuit Judge

It is indeed unusual, if not extraordinary,1 for a member of the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals who disagrees with a panel opinion to continue to fight after rehearing en banc has been denied by the majority of the court. So far as my memory serves, I have had but one occasion to dissent from the denial of a rehearing en banc in over eight years on the court. Now I have a second occasion, because I perceive the court’s failure to grant rehearing as a dangerous error that may entrench a mischievous and unjust decision.

Of course, my colleagues may simply conclude that my sight is distorted…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Murphy v. American Home Products Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Burnett v. New York Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API