Dorothy R. Cannon v. The Kroger Co.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1DissentMurnaghan, Circuit Judge
It is indeed unusual, if not extraordinary,1 for a member of the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals who disagrees with a panel opinion to continue to fight after rehearing en banc has been denied by the majority of the court. So far as my memory serves, I have had but one occasion to dissent from the denial of a rehearing en banc in over eight years on the court. Now I have a second occasion, because I perceive the court’s failure to grant rehearing as a dangerous error that may entrench a mischievous and unjust decision.
Of course, my colleagues may simply conclude that my sight is distorted…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Murphy v. American Home Products Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Burnett v. New York Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.