Legal Opinion
Wilson v. Tauer
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided December 17, 1920No. 21,896PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Action in the district court for Beltrami county to recover a balance of $143.65 for work and labor. The case was tried before Wright, X, who made findings and ordered judgment in favor of defendant dismissing the action. From the findings and order dismissing the action, plaintiff appealed.
1Opinion of the Court
Pee Curiam.
The appeal in the above entitled action was taken from the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the court, made after trial without a jury. The order is not appealable. Von Glahn v. Sommer, 11 Minn. 132 (203); Johnson v. Northern Pacific, F. F. & B. H. Ry. Co. 39 Minn. 30, 38 N. W. 804; Holliston v. Ernston, 120 Minn. 507, 139 N. W. 805.
Appeal dismissed.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- City of Winona v. HuffSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1866
- Holliston v. ErnstonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Johnson v. Northern Pacific, Fergus Falls & Black Hills Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
3Cited by5 opinions
- Shema v. Thorpe Bros.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- Cucchiarella v. KolodziegSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
- Minnesota Power & Light Co. v. Carlton CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- Merz v. OftedalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- Minnesota Power & Light Company v. Carlton CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980