Roberts v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.

Judge WEBB

dissenting.

In my view, the plain language of the seven insurance policies before us at least raises a disputed factual issue concerning plaintiffs’ entitlement to $200,000 in uninsured motoristyunderinsured motorist (UM/UIM) coverage, notwithstanding the anti-stacking provisions in each of the policies. Because our review of both the trial court’s summary judgment and the policy language is de novo, I would interpret these provisions in light of the policies’ identification of two different companies as insurance providers, even though this argument was not raised below.…