Legal Opinion
Fininen v. Barlow
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 22, 2006No. B183709PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
COFFEE, J.
Mark Barlow appeals from the judgment confirming the arbitration award in favor of respondents Rick Fininen, Kris Fininen, Greg Dotson, Dianne Dotson and Lori Foster. Before respondents filed this action, Barlow settled another case at the recommendation of Craig McCollum, the mediator. Barlow and respondents subsequently agreed that McCollum should serve as the arbitrator of this action. Barlow contends that Code of Civil Procedure section 1286.2, subdivision (a)(6) compelled the trial court to vacate the arbitration award because McCollum failed to disclose his involvement…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Moncharsh v. Heily & BlaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Marsch v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Azteca Construction, Inc. v. ADR Consulting, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2004
- Betz v. PankowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Campbell v. ZolinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Haworth v. Superior Court of Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- Guseinov v. BurnsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- United Health Centers of the San Joaquin Valley, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Mt. Holyoke Homes, L.P. v. Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell, LLPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Haworth v. Superior Court of Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.