Enomoto v. Space Adventures, Ltd.
District Court, E.D. Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JAMES C. CACHERIS, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint. For the following reasons, the Court will grant in part and deny in part the motion.
I. Background
The allegations in the Amended Complaint are as follows. On November 3, 2004, Daisuke Enomoto (“Plaintiff’ or “Enomoto”) and Space Adventures, Ltd. (“Defendant” or “SA”) entered into the Orbital Space Flight Purchase Agreement (the “Agreement”), a written contract under which Defendant promised to facilitate Plaintiffs participation in an orbital space flight…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Jenkins v. McKeithenSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Filak v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Virginia · 2004
- Richmond Metropolitan Authority v. McDevitt Street Bovis, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1998
- Ward's Equipment, Inc. v. New Holland North America, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1997
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by74 opinions
- Stoney Glen, LLC v. Southern Bank & Trust Co.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2013
- John Doe v. Marymount Univ.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2018
- Nahigian v. Juno Loudoun, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2010
- Wolf v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'nDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2011
- Design & Production, Inc. v. American Exhibitions, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2011
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.