Legal Opinion

Medical Finance Ass'n v. Rambo

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 28, 1938No. Civ. A. 4143PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, P. J.

Sections 690 and 690.11, Code of Civil Procedure, exempt from execution or attachment, in a case such as we have here, “one-half of the earnings of the defendant or judgment debtor received for his personal services rendered at any time within thirty days next preceding the levy of attachment or execution” upon a proper showing that such half is necessary for the support, of himself and family. The word “received”, here, is not to be taken as requiring that earnings, to be exempt, must be paid over to the judgment debtor. So to construe it would prevent the exemption of earnings which, like…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bliss v. SmithIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Wade v. RathbunCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  3. Hall v. HartwellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886
  4. Oil Well Supply Co. v. GalbreathSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  5. California United States Bond & Mortgage Corp. v. GrodzinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Imperial Bank v. Pim Electric, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1995
  2. Miller v. MonreanAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Miller v. BarronWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Haddad v. Chubb (In Re Haddad)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  5. Snyder v. SwensonAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API