Legal Opinion
Transnor (Bermuda) Ltd. v. BP North America Petroleum
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 10, 1990No. 86 Civ. 1493 (WCC)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
WILLIAM C. CONNER, District Judge.
Defendants Conoco, Inc., Conoco (U.K.) Ltd. and Exxon Corporation move for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56, Fed.R. Civ.P. on the grounds that the claims of plaintiff Transnor (Bermuda) Ltd. (“Trans-nor”) for losses in the Brent Oil market, allegedly totalling $17 million, and lost profit damages on unrelated businesses, allegedly totalling nearly $65 million 1 are invalid as a matter of law. For the reasons set forth below, defendants’ motion is granted in part and denied in part.
SUMMARY JUDGMENT STANDARD
A party seeking summary judgment…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Three Crown Ltd. Partnership v. SALOMON BROS. INC.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- Conergy Ag v. Memc Electronic Materials, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Toker v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997