Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Mangum

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 18, 1966No. Crim. No. 12090PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKingsley, J.

Defendant and a eodefendant were charged with the following crimes: grand theft (violation of Pen. Code, § 487, snbd. 3), theft of a vehicle (violation of Veh. Code, § 10851), receiving stolen property (violation of Pen. Code, § 496), and burglary (violation of Pen. Code, § 459).

Defendant with counsel present pled “not guilty" to the charges in the information. A jury was sworn, a mistrial was declared, and defendant, with counsel present, waived trial by jury. Defendant was found guilty on count I (a violation of Pen. Code, § 487, subd. 3) and not guilty on the other counts. A motion for new…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. JeffriesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  2. People v. VidalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  3. People v. CatalineCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  4. People v. GillsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  5. People v. FierroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. ChampionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  2. People v. DupreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  3. People v. SimsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  4. People v. ChampionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API