Legal Opinion

People v. Fierro

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 29, 1934No. Crim. No. 2574PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ARCHBALD, J., pro tem.

Appellant and his co-defendant, Tellez, were charged with the theft of a Ford automobile in count 1 of an information, on which count they were found guilty in a trial before the court without a jury. From the judgment of conviction on such count, as well as an admitted prior conviction, Fierro has appealed.

It is urged (1) that the court erred in denying appellant’s motion to dismiss, made at the close of the People’s case; (A) that the evidence does not show that appellant had possession of the stolen automobile; (3) that it is insufficient to establish his guilt beyond…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. MangumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API