State ex rel. Wahoo Water Works Co. v. City of Wahoo
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error to the district court for Saunders county. Tried below before Hollenbeck, J.
1Opinion of the Court
Hastings, C.
May 16, 1889, the city of Wahoo adopted an ordinance1 “to supply water to the city of Wahoo,” and authorizing plaintiff to construct, maintain and operate water-works in the city. By section 3 the city agrees, in consideration of benefits derived, to rent for twenty years forty-three1 hydrants, at an annual rental of $46.50 for the first ten years and $58 for the second ten years, after January 1, 1899, for each hydrant. The ordinance was accepted by the plaintiff and the plant erected, and the rents paid for some years — plaintiff says until 1898, — when the city refused to levy…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Worthington v. District Court of the Second Judicial DistrictNevada Supreme Court · 1914
- School Dist. No. 11 v. ChapmanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
- State ex rel. Oldham v. DeanNebraska Supreme Court · 1909
- State ex rel. Young v. RoyseNebraska Supreme Court · 1904
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.