Legal Opinion

Adibi v. California State Board of Pharmacy

District Court, N.D. California

Decided November 9, 2006No. C-05-0605 EMCPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; AND DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

(Docket Nos. 58, 64)

CHEN, United States Magistrate Judge.

Plaintiffs Afshin Adibi and International Pharmaceutical Services (“IPS”) have filed suit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Defendants the California State Board of Pharmacy (“Board”) and its executive director Patricia Harris in her official capacity. According to Plaintiffs, Defendants’ actions violated both the Foreign Commerce Clause and the Supremacy Clause. Currently pending before the Court are the parties’ cross-motions…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Middlesex County Ethics Committee v. Garden State Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Pennzoil Co. v. Texaco Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Ohio Civil Rights Commission v. Dayton Christian Schools, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hanover Insurance v. Fremont BankDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
  2. United States v. AdamsDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2007
  3. Jensen v. Utah CountyDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2025
  4. Moore v. GarnandDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2024
  5. Sanai v. CardonaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API