Legal Opinion
United States v. Adams
District Court, D. Maine
Decided February 8, 2007No. CV-06-97-B-WPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON UNITED STATES’ MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND/OR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
WOODCOCK, District Judge.
On May 8, 2006, James Douglas Cowie and 21 other Verizon customers initiated a “Ten Person Complaint” with the Maine Public Utilities Commission (PUC) that has become a test of wills between the United States of America and the state of Maine. The PUC recently issued a subpoena against Verizon New England, Inc. 1 (Verizon), commanding it to attend a hearing, scheduled for tomorrow afternoon, to show cause as to why Verizon should not be held in contempt for its failure to…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Middlesex County Ethics Committee v. Garden State Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Wayte v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY TELECOMMUNICATIONS RECORDS LITIGATIONDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2007
- Clayton v. AT & T Communications of Southwest, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2009