Legal Opinion
United States v. One 1989 Stratford Fairmont 14' X 70' Mobile Home
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided February 11, 1992No. 91 C 1792PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SHADUR, District Judge.
This proposed drug-related forfeiture of a mobile home poses, at least so far as reported cases are concerned, a question of first impression anywhere. Both the United States and claimant Mark Stover (“Sto-ver”) 1 have moved for summary judgment under Fed.R.Civ.P. (“Rule”) 56,2 coupling their motions with the required statements under this District Court’s General Rule (“GR”) 12(m)3 as well as supporting memo-randa. Each party has responded to the other’s submission, and the case is ripe for decision. For the reasons stated in this memorandum…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Bank Leumi Le-Israel, B.M., a Foreign Corporation v. Dennis Lee, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- United States v. FlemingCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Leonard B. Steele, (83-5108), Marvin Lee Echols, (83-5109), David A. Warren, (83-5110), Jackie Wayne Scarborough, (83-5111)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
- United States v. a Single Story Double Wide TrailerDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1989
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Rochman v. Cape Mercantile Bank & Trust Co. (In Re Casper)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Illinois · 1993
- United States v. One 1989 Stratford Fairmont, Mark Stover, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993