Anglin v. State

OPINION

SULLIVAN, Judge.

Appellant James R. Anglin (Anglin) appeals the denial of his petition for posteonvietion relief asserting that the trial judge’s responses to certain jury questions during deliberations constituted prejudicial error.

We affirm.

Because we affirm the post-conviction court’s determination that the error, if any, was harmless, we need not address Anglin’s assertions that he was denied effective assistance of appellate counsel.

During the habitual offender phase of Ang-lin’s original trial, the jury sent two notes to the trial judge during deliberations. The first read: “What…