Legal Opinion

Riggs v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 15, 1997No. 49A02-9702-PC-120PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FRIEDLANDER, Judge.

Sterling Riggs appeals from the denial of his petition for post-conviction relief, raising the following restated issues:

1. Did the post-conviction court err in rejecting Riggs’s claim that he was denied the right to be present at all *461critical stages of the proceedings when neither Riggs nor his attorney was present when the trial court informed the jury during deliberations that the court could not answer the jury’s questions about the evidence and denied its request for certain items of physical evidence?

2. Did the post-conviction court err in determining that…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Marsillett v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Moffatt v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Madden v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. State v. WintersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. Johnson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bouye v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Robinson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Roberts v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. Gibson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. Kyung Sil Choi, Bo Kang Park, and Han Chong v. Jung Hee Kim (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2020

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API