Legal Opinion
State v. Wynne
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 19, 2018No. AC39169PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBright, J.
The defendant, Paul Wynne, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered following a jury trial, of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor or any drug or both in violation of General Statutes § 14-227a (a) (1). The defendant claims that (1) the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction; and (2) the court abused its discretion in admitting the testimony of the state's expert on drug recognition. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The jury was presented with the following evidence on which to base its verdict. On September 6, 2014, at…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Connecticut v. PorterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- State v. GonzalezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- State v. TorresSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. TurnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2020
- State v. Mark T.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2021
- Kissel v. Center for Women's Health, P.C.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2021
- State v. WynneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2018