Legal Opinion
Wojcinski v. Foley
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided August 6, 1963No. Civ. No. 9567PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRENNAN, District Judge.
Through the medium of an order to show cause, the defendants seek a summary judgment dismissing plaintiff’s amended complaint.
This action may be termed an offshoot of an action previously brought by the plaintiff against the Oneida National Bank and Trust Company of Central New York. The first claim for relief in the above action requires the determination of plaintiff’s claim of ownership of a bank account standing in the names of one Fijalkowski, now deceased, and the plaintiff. The defendant, Arthur J. Foley, is now the executor of the Estate of said Fijalkowski.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Andrews v. . GardinerNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Frawley Chemical Corp. v. A. P. Larson Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1949
- Carroll v. Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1937
- Le Massena v. StormAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
- Brown v. MackNew York Supreme Court · 1945
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Middelkamp v. HanewichIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
- Corbin v. Washington Fire and Marine Insurance Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1968
- Robert J. Wojcinski v. Arthur J. Foley and Arthur J. Foley, Jr., Jointly and SeverallyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
- Wojcinski v. FoleyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964