State v. Godwin
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ELMORE, Judge.
*184 William Edward Godwin, III (defendant), appeals his conviction for driving while impaired following a jury trial in superior court. The *185 question for decision is whether Rule 702(a1) of the North Carolina Rules of Evidence requires a witness to be qualified as an expert before he may testify to the issue of impairment related to HGN test results. We hold that it does.
I. Background
The State's evidence at trial tended to show the following: On 18 January 2011, at approximately 10:14 p.m., Daniel Kennerly, an officer with the Charlotte Mecklenburg Police Department, observed…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- In Re the Appeal From the Civil PenaltySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2008
- In Re Appeal of the Greens of Pine Glen Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2003
- State v. GoodeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1995
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. GodwinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2017
- State v. YountsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
- State v. TorrenceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
- State v. KillianCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016