Zartman v. Reisem
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtSimons, J.
The broad issue presented in this appeal is whether the respondents, members of the Rochester Preservation Board and other city officials, improperly granted a certificate of appropriateness to Dr. G. H. Jackson and his wife to build a tennis court in their backyard.
Petitioners, Leonard and Barbara Zartman, are the owners of residential property known as 60 Hawthorne Street in Rochester. Immediately south of their property is the residence of Dr. Jackson and his family, known as 50 Hawthorne Street. Both properties are located in a one-family residential zone in which private tennis courts…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Doty v. LoveSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Ottinger v. Arenal Realty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Gerling v. Board of Zoning AppealsNew York Supreme Court · 1957
- Gazan v. CorbettNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Dupont Circle Citizens Ass'n v. BarryDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- Foxluger v. GossinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Lovett v. FlackeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Washington County Cease, Inc. v. PersicoNew York Supreme Court · 1983
- Bartholomay v. Zoning Board of AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.