Bartholomay v. Zoning Board of Appeals

Judgment unanimously reversed, without costs, and matter remitted to zoning board of appeals for further proceedings in accordance with the following memorandum: Respondents, officials of the City of Rochester, and the property owner, appeal from a judgment of Special Term which annulled two variances relating to property owned by respondent Carter. Special Term did not reach the merits but determined that the zoning board lacked subject matter jurisdiction because the board had not notified at least 25 owners of property adjacent to the rezoned parcel as required by the city ordinance…