Legal Opinion
United States v. Southern Florida Water Management District
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided August 23, 1994No. Nos. 92-4314, 92-4831PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DYER, Senior Circuit Judge:
The Intervenor defendants appeal an interlocutory order granting an injunction entered by the district court in its Order Entering Settlement Agreement as Consent Decree. They assert lack of jurisdiction and a host of other issues that exceed the scope of their limited right to intervene granted by the prior panel in this case. On the cross-appeal of the United States, the government appeals the judgment of the district court that an impact statement pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (“NEPA”), 42 U.S.C. § 4321 et seq. (1970), is required. We…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- O'Shea v. LittletonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Woodham v. Federal Transit AdministrationDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2000
- Fund for Animals v. BabbittDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 1996
- Fund for Animals v. BabbittDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 1997
- Sywula v. DaCostaDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2022
- United States of America, Plaintiff-Counterclaim Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant, Florida Keys Citizen Coalition, Florida Audubon Society, Florida Wildlife Federation, Environmental Defense Fund, Sierra Club, National Wildlife Federation, Wilderness Society, National Parks & Conservation Association, Defenders of Wildlife and Treasure Coast Environmental Coalition, Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida, Intervenor v. Southern Florida Water Management District and Florida Department of Environmental Regulation, Tilford Creel, Defendants-Counterclaim Carol Browner, City of Belle Glade, City of Clewiston, Intervenor-Defendants-Appellants-Cross-Appellees, Western Palm Beach County Farm Bureau, Inc., Florida Sugar Cane League, Inc., Roth Farms, Inc. And K.W.B. Farms, Intervenor-Defendants- Counterclaim, Plaintiffs- Appellants- Florida Fruit & Vegetable Association, Intervenor-Defendant, South Bay Growers, Inc., Movant, Colonel Bruce A. Malson, Counterclaim United States of America, Plaintiff-Counterclaim Florida Keys Citizen Coalition, Intervenor-Plaintiff-Appellee, Florida Audubon Society, Intervenor-Plaintiffs v. South Florida Water Management Division, Florida Department of Environmental Regulation, Defendants-Counterclaim Tilford Creel, City of Belle Glade, City of Clewiston, Intervenor-Defendants-Appellants, West Palm Beach County Farm, Florida Sugar Cane League, Inc., Roth Farms, Inc. And K.W.B. Farms, Intervenor-Defendants-Counterclaim, Florida Fruit & Vegetable Association, Intervenor-Defendant, South Bay Growers, Inc., Movant, Colonel Bruce A. Malson, CounterclaimCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994