Legal Opinion

St. Paul State Bank v. Rippe Grain & Milling Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 27, 1924No. 23,997PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lees, C.

Appeal from an order denying plaintiff’s blended motion for judgment or a new trial of an action brought on a draft for $2,000 drawn by defendant on the Cargill Commission Company, made payable to the Emmet County Bank and indorsed by that bank to the plaintiff.

It had been defendant’s practice to issue such drafts and deposit them for credit, drawing checks against its account with the payee bank to pay for grain purchased. The draft in question was dated December 18, 1920, deposited and credited December 20 and indorsed. and mailed to the plaintiff on that day with other credit items…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In re State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
  2. Steele v. Commissioner of BanksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  3. Security Bank v. Northwestern Fuel Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
  4. McWethy v. NorbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
  5. First National Bank v. MalmquistSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States Mortgage Co. v. Hotel Radisson Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  2. Kessler v. KruidenierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  3. Grocers, Inc. v. HorstmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  4. State v. GustavsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API