Yeager v. Roberts
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Darrell Hickman, Justice.
The circuit judge granted the appellees’ motion for a new trial because the jury’s verdict was against the preponderance of the evidence. On appeal it is argued that since the appellees, plaintiffs below, did not move for a directed verdict, they were precluded by ARCP Rule 50(e) from moving for a new trial. We find no merit to this argument and affirm the decision of the trial court.
This is a negligence case involving an accident between a tractor-trailer rig and a car. The issue of liability was virtually conceded by the appellants. The appellants are the driver and…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Landis v. HastingsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
3Cited by12 opinions
- Pearson v. HenricksonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. TuckerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
- Switzer v. Shelter Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
- Hall v. GrimmettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
- MacHost v. SimkinsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2004
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.