Legal Opinion

Yeager v. Roberts

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 3, 1986No. 85-222PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Darrell Hickman, Justice.

The circuit judge granted the appellees’ motion for a new trial because the jury’s verdict was against the preponderance of the evidence. On appeal it is argued that since the appellees, plaintiffs below, did not move for a directed verdict, they were precluded by ARCP Rule 50(e) from moving for a new trial. We find no merit to this argument and affirm the decision of the trial court.

This is a negligence case involving an accident between a tractor-trailer rig and a car. The issue of liability was virtually conceded by the appellants. The appellants are the driver and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Landis v. HastingsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Pearson v. HenricksonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  2. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. TuckerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  3. Switzer v. Shelter Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  4. Hall v. GrimmettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  5. MacHost v. SimkinsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2004

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API