Mathews v. Converse
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Suit to foreclose a judgment lien and to have certain conveyances set aside as fraudulent and void against the plaintiff, brought to the Superior Court in Tolland County where a demurrer to the complaint was overruled (Ralph Wheeler, J.) and the cause was afterward tried to the court, Case, J.; facts found and judgment rendered for the plaintiff, from which the defendants appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtThayer, J.
The complaint states that the plaintiff obtained a judgment against three of the defendants, Mira L. Converse, Lillia A. Lee, and Louis S. Converse, at the September term, 1905, of the Superior Court in Tolland county, that the judgment was partially satisfied only, and that a hen for the balance due upon the judgment was placed upon the property now sought to be foreclosed. It is alleged that this property was attached on May 23d, 1905, upon the original writ in the action, as the property of the defendants above named, and that they are, as to the plaintiff, the actual owners of the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Kelsey v. RemerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1875
- Trumbull v. HewittSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1894
3Cited by13 opinions
- Blakeslee v. Board of Water CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
- Zapolsky v. SacksSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Cashman v. Meriden HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
- Skinner v. SkinnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
- Mac's Car City, Inc. v. DiLoretoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.