United States v. Carter
U.S. Army Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
CLAUSEN, Chief Judge:
Appellant was convicted, contrary to his pleas, of three specifications of soliciting a bribe and one specification of receiving a bribe, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 201(e) and Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 934. These offenses arose out of events preceding the trials of two other noncommissioned officers for the larceny of a large quantity of cigarettes from a commissary warehouse in Bangkok, Thailand.
In exchange for his testimony against these two NCO’s, appellant received a grant of transactional immunity covering…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Egan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
- United States v. KeithUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1952
- United States v. BarnesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
- Wilson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935
- United States v. BeyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. LewisU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1980
- United States v. AguayoU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1981