Crossman v. Lurman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the plaintiffs, George W. Crossman and another, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the defendants, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 31st day of May, 1900, upon the verdict of a jury, and also from an order entered in said clerk’s office on the 31st day of May, 1900, denying the plaintiffs' motion for a new trial made upon the minutes.
1Opinion of the Court
Rtjmsey, J.:
This action was brought to recover damages because of the refusal of the defendants to accept certain coffee which the plaintiffs agreed to sell to them. The coffee was tendered to the defendants and was refused because it did not comply with the contract, which was to sell 500 bags of sound Rio coffee in’ grade about standard eight and nine of the Coffee Exchange. The contract contained a provision.for grading and arbitration in case of a dispute, as to which it is only necessary to say that there was a dispute and that an arbitrar tian was had, and the arbitrators decided that…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Thurlow v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1847
- Bowman v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Pollock v. . PollockNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Crossman v. LurmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
- In re LurmanNew York Supreme Court · 1895
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ensign v. New York Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
- Kumberger v. MillerAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1901