Legal Opinion
Ensign v. New York Life Insurance
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 7, 1923PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Van Kirk, J.:
The record discloses that the appellant is justified in conceding that “ the facts here proved are essentially the same as in the case *691of Kathryn D. Ensign v. Travelers Insurance Company (193 App. Div. 369),” a companion case to this. In that case this court affirmed the judgment and in the two opinions is a complete statement of the facts. From this statement it appears that the case is very close upon the evidence, but upon this appeal we should consider only errors in rulings of the court. The rulings, to which appellant excepted, and which it urges here, are as follows:
1. The…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Pollock v. . PollockNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Crossman v. . LurmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
- Lubbee v. HilgertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
- Ensign v. Travelers InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
- Crossman v. LurmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
3Cited by6 opinions
- Herring v. HayesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Zapata v. DagostinoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Morell v. VargasCivil Court of the City of New York · 1975
- Hegyi v. JonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
- MacIver v. LyonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.