Legal Opinion

Bottero v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 1, 1983No. 3130PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POPOVICH, Judge:

This is an appeal from an order of the trial court denying a petition to open judgment which was filed by appellant, Alvira Bottero. 1 We affirm.

The facts in this case are as follows:

Appellant-plaintiff filed a summons in trespass on December 22, 1978, after she had fallen in a shopping center which was owned by two of the defendants, Abe Greenberg and Ivy Ridge Investment Corporation. Appellee-defendant, The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc. (A & P) rented one of the stores in the shopping center, and appellant fell some distance from the A & P store.

Appellant served…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. BALK v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  2. McCoy v. Public Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Thorn v. Clearfield BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  4. Goldstein v. Graduate Hospital of the University of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  5. Dupree v. LEE, MDSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Noetzel v. Glasgow, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Buxbaum v. PegueroSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Kyung Ha Jung v. St. Paul's ParishSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Iole v. Western Auto Supply Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Ridgid Fire Sprinkler Service, Inc. v. ChaikenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API