Legal Opinion

Ridgid Fire Sprinkler Service, Inc. v. Chaiken

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 7, 1984No. 2905PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

Ridgid Fire Sprinkler Service, Inc. has appealed from an order of the trial court opening a judgment obtained by default against Selma Chaiken. Because Mrs. Chaiken’s petition to open was not timely filed and because she failed to offer a reasonable excuse for her default, we conclude that it was an abuse of discretion to open the judgment. Therefore, we reverse.

A petition to open a default judgment is an appeal to the court’s equitable powers. Boyle v. Horstman, 311 Pa.Super. 109, 113, 457 A.2d 518, 520 (1983); Provident Credit Corp. v. Young, 300 Pa.Super. 117, 123, 446 A.2d…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Kraynick v. HERTZSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  2. McCoy v. Public Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Pappas v. StefanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. Provident Credit Corp. v. YoungSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Schutte v. Valley Bargain Center, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Noetzel v. Glasgow, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Cross v. 50th Ward Community Ambulance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Abraham Zion Corp. v. After Six, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Davis v. BurtonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Agency Ins. Co. v. Bacon, R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API