Ridgid Fire Sprinkler Service, Inc. v. Chaiken
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
WIEAND, Judge:
Ridgid Fire Sprinkler Service, Inc. has appealed from an order of the trial court opening a judgment obtained by default against Selma Chaiken. Because Mrs. Chaiken’s petition to open was not timely filed and because she failed to offer a reasonable excuse for her default, we conclude that it was an abuse of discretion to open the judgment. Therefore, we reverse.
A petition to open a default judgment is an appeal to the court’s equitable powers. Boyle v. Horstman, 311 Pa.Super. 109, 113, 457 A.2d 518, 520 (1983); Provident Credit Corp. v. Young, 300 Pa.Super. 117, 123, 446 A.2d…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Kraynick v. HERTZSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- McCoy v. Public Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Pappas v. StefanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Provident Credit Corp. v. YoungSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Schutte v. Valley Bargain Center, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Noetzel v. Glasgow, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Cross v. 50th Ward Community Ambulance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Abraham Zion Corp. v. After Six, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Davis v. BurtonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Agency Ins. Co. v. Bacon, R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.