Legal Opinion

Lane v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 24, 1911No. 3227PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Accusation of assault and battery; from city court of Millen— Judge Jones. February 10, 1911.

1Opinion of the CourtHill, C. J.

1. One of the grounds of the motion for a new trial in this case alleges that the trial judge refused to comply with a timely request, made by the defendant’s attorney, to reduce his charge to writing and to read it to the jury. This ground of the motion is duly verified. In the certificate to the bill of exceptions the trial judge inserts, at the close of the usual certificate and before his signature, the following: “I certify.further that, just before beginning my charge to the jury, E. K. Overstreet, the defendant’s attorney, who requested me to charge the jury in writing, came to tbe…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Scott v. WhippleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  2. McCullough Export Lumber & Warehouse Co. v. National Bank of BrunswickSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  3. Pusey & Co. v. SweatSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
  4. Clary v. NashCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Williams v. Atlanta National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  2. McRae v. BoykinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  3. Jones v. PierceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
  4. Keough v. Georgia Power Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API