Legal Opinion

Pusey & Co. v. Sweat

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 27, 1894PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Application for mandamus.

1Opinion of the Court

Lumpkin, Justice.

The bill of exceptions was not certified within thirty-days from the date of the decision complained of, which was the overruling of a motion for a new'- trial. In a separate certificate, however, the judge states facts explaining the delay, which would probably be sufficient to make the certificate in time. It also appeared that the application for the writ of mandamus was not presented to this court on or before the third day of the term after the refusal of the judge to sign the certificate as presented, and the point was made that, under the 29th rule of court, the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Anderson v. FawSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
  2. Pendley v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hawkins v. Mayor of AmericusSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  2. Bailey & Carney Buggy Co. v. GuthrieCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  3. Allison & Davis v. JowersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
  4. Scott v. WhippleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  5. W. T. Rawleigh Company v. ForbesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API