Legal Opinion

In Re Vioxx Products Liability Litigation

District Court, E.D. Louisiana

Decided March 22, 2007No. MDL 1657PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER & REASONS

FALLON, District Judge.

Before the Court is Merck & Co., Inc.’s (“Merck”) Motion for Summary Judgment (Rec.Doc.7345) in three individual Vioxx cases on statutes of limitations grounds. The Court heard oral argument and took this motion under submission. Given the existence of factual disputes regarding both the triggering and tolling of the various limitations periods, Merck’s motion is now DENIED.

I. BACKGROUND

This multidistrict products liability litigation involves the prescription drug Vioxx, known generically as Rofecoxib. Merck, a New Jersey corporation, researched,…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. Crown, Cork & Seal Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. In Re Vioxx Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2007
  2. In re Anthem, Inc. Data Breach LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2016
  3. Victoria Looper v. Cook IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2021
  4. Marye Wahl v. General Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
  5. In Re Vioxx Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2007

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API