Legal Opinion

City of Detroit v. George

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 19, 1921No. Docket No. 59PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to Wayne; Codd (George P.), J. Assumpsit by the city of Detroit against Edwin S. George for taxes. Judgment for defendant on a directed verdict. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

This is an action of assumpsit brought by the city of Detroit against the defendant to recover certain personal taxes alleged to have been levied in the years 1912-1916, against defendant on a certain building upon land belonging to the University of Michigan, and leased to the defendant. There was a directed verdict followed by a judgment in favor of the defendant, and the plaintiff has brought the case here for review upon writ of error. The facts in the case were stipulated in writing by the attorneys for the respective parties, and the stipulation was filed *666and read in evidence at the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Auditor General v. SparrowMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Aplin v. Regents of the UniversityMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Hart v. HendersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1868
  4. Township of Caledonia v. RoseMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Johnson v. BurghornMichigan Supreme Court · 1920

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Sprik v. REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICH.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. Lucking v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Rockwell Spring & Axle Co. v. Romulus TownshipMichigan Supreme Court · 1962
  4. City of Ann Arbor v. University Cellar, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. Continental Motors Corp. v. Township of MuskegonMichigan Supreme Court · 1965

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API