Darrah v. Boyce
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Mecosta. (Fuller, J'.') Bill for an accounting. Dismissed on general demurrer. Complainant appeals. The facts are stated in the opinion, and in head-note 1..
1Opinion of the CourtSherwood, J.
The bill in this case is filed to obtain an accounting.
In January, 1878, Henry Barton and Benjamin Dalziel, as copartners under the name of Barton & Dalziel, made a contract in writing with defendant, bearing date December 31, 1877, which, after reciting—
“ That Barton & Dalziel, the parties of the first part, are desirous of cutting a large quantity of saw-logs during the ensuing winter, and having them manufactured into lumber during the season of 1878, and sold for their benefit and profit, and to that end are desirous of securing sufficient loans and advances, sawing and selling contracts,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Marvin v. . BrooksNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
- Heath v. WatersMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
3Cited by15 opinions
- Petrie v. TorrentMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
- Warren v. HolbrookMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
- Causten v. BarnetteWashington Supreme Court · 1908
- Holliday v. PerryIndiana Court of Appeals · 1906
- Frankfort Marine Accident and Plate Glass Insurance Co. v. California Artistic Metal and Wire Co.California Court of Appeal · 1915
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.