Legal Opinion

Schwartzle v. Dale

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 22, 1952No. File 9248PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

Predicated upon the repudiation of an alleged parol agreement to hold described real property in trust for plaintiffs’ predecessors in interest, the complaint prays for restitution. The trial court found that defendant verbally agreed to hold the property in trust but concluded that (a) the alleged cause of action was barred by certain final decrees in probate, and (b) the plaintiffs are estopped by laches to assert their cause of action, and (c) the defendant holds title by adverse possession and payment of taxes during ten years. The appeal is from a judgment for defendant.

By way of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Steinberger v. SteinbergerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  2. Airola v. GorhamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  3. Jaeger v. SechserSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1936
  4. In Re Farm. State Bk. of AmherstSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Parr v. ReymanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of HobelsbergerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Grandin v. GardinerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1954
  3. First American Bank & Trust, N.A. v. Farmers State Bank of CantonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Brandriet v. Norwest Bank South Dakota, N.A.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Buxcel v. First Fidelity BankSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API